From 402dbc11d57a584a7b69aaababd076a8b462b24b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Willy Tarreau Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:53:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] MINOR: checks: use conn_full_close() instead of conn_force_close() There's no point in using conn_force_close() in the checks since they do not use XPRT_TRACKED so both functions are equivalent. --- src/checks.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/checks.c b/src/checks.c index b61f27a..e6cc42a 100644 --- a/src/checks.c +++ b/src/checks.c @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ static int wake_srv_chk(struct connection *conn) * sure want to abort the hard way. */ conn_sock_drain(conn); - conn_force_close(conn); + conn_full_close(conn); ret = -1; } @@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ static struct task *process_chk_conn(struct task *t) * server state to be suddenly changed. */ conn_sock_drain(conn); - conn_force_close(conn); + conn_full_close(conn); } if (conn) { @@ -2640,7 +2640,7 @@ static int tcpcheck_main(struct check *check) * 3: release and replace the old one on success */ if (check->conn) { - conn_force_close(check->conn); + conn_full_close(check->conn); retcode = -1; /* do not reuse the fd! */ } -- 1.7.10.4